You have a Figma file. We are the agency that turns it into a production Webflow build — pixel-perfect, performance-budgeted, with a CMS your marketing team can run on Tuesday morning without calling us. No template swaps, no broken responsive states, no "close enough" spacing.
Three patterns we see in nearly every project we inherit. If two or more sound familiar, you are paying twice for the same site.
Spacing is a few pixels off everywhere, type sizes drift between sections, the hero feels cramped, the CTA looks off-brand. Your designer keeps pinging the developer with screenshots and red arrows. Three weeks later it is still "90% there".
Desktop looks great, tablet collapses awkwardly, mobile has horizontal scroll. The Figma file did not specify breakpoints, so the developer guessed. The mobile bounce rate is 70% and nobody knows why.
Marketing wants to add a new blog post; Webflow opens, panic ensues, the post never gets published. The CMS schema was built around the design, not around how an editor thinks. Now every content update is a developer ticket.
There are three realistic ways to get a Figma file into Webflow. All three are legitimate — for different jobs. Here is the honest version of the trade-off.
| Figma-to-Webflow plugin | Freelancer | Agency — Funky Rabbit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixel accuracy | Auto-generated layers; absolute positioning, drifts on first edit | Depends entirely on who you hired | Verified side-by-side at every sign-off breakpoint |
| Responsive states | Desktop only — breakpoints are on you | Built if the Figma specified them, guessed if not | Missing states designed with you before the build |
| CMS architecture | None — static layers | Often mirrors the design, not the editor | Collections designed around how an editor thinks |
| Performance | Heavy absolute-positioned output | Rarely budgeted or measured | LCP < 2.5 s / CLS < 0.1, verified with WebPageTest |
| Editor handoff | — | A goodbye message | Training, ops guide, two weeks of async support |
| Price shape | $0–50/mo subscription | Hourly, open-ended | Fixed per template, quoted before the build |
| Best for | Prototypes and quick previews | Small one-off pages with a complete Figma | Production marketing sites your team will run |
A production Webflow site that matches the Figma file, performs on a phone, and your marketing team owns. Every artefact below is part of the standard scope.
Every section matches the Figma at the sign-off breakpoint. Spacing, type sizes, colours, radii, shadows — all from the design tokens. Verified with a side-by-side comparison, not eyeballed.
Mobile (375), tablet (768), desktop (1280), wide (1440+) — all designed and verified on real devices, not just resized in a browser. If the Figma did not specify, we design the missing breakpoints with you.
A library of branded, reusable components in Webflow Symbols / Variables — mapped 1:1 to your Figma components so the design and the build stay in sync long after launch.
Collections for blog, case studies, customers, integrations — structured so an editor can publish in three fields, not seventeen. Reference fields wired correctly so nothing orphans.
Real targets: LCP under 2.5 s on mobile, CLS under 0.1, total page weight under 1.2 MB on the homepage. Verified with WebPageTest, not just Webflow’s built-in score.
Title / description / OG metadata patterns per template, JSON-LD where it earns its place, GA4 + GTM wired with sensible event names, redirects map if migrating from another platform.
Loom walkthroughs, a one-page ops guide, and a 60-min live training with whoever will be editing the site. Two weeks of free async support after delivery.
Translating a Figma file into a production Webflow build is not the same job as building a Webflow site from scratch, and it is not the same job as converting Figma into Next.js. Webflow has its own grid, its own breakpoint system, its own interactions, its own CMS structure — and a Figma file that did not consider any of that will fight the build at every turn.
The skill is structural — reading the Figma intent (not just the pixels), mapping it to Webflow primitives, and filling in what the design did not specify (responsive states, hover states, loading states, empty states). Most agencies treat this as a typing exercise; the result is the "90% there" build you have now. We treat it as a translation, with a designer in the room.
Two days of intake, one week of build, three days of polish, two days of handoff — with one approval checkpoint mid-build.
Figma walkthrough, brand audit, CMS schema design, missing-state design (responsive, hover, loading, empty). You sign off the schema and the missing states before we open Webflow.
Webflow build with Symbols, Variables, and CMS Collections. Daily Loom walkthroughs, one formal review checkpoint at the midpoint. Performance verified continuously, not at the end.
Side-by-side pixel comparison with the Figma, responsive states verified on real devices, accessibility pass (keyboard navigation, contrast, screen-reader labels). All your "is this off by 2px?" questions answered.
Editor training, ops guide, redirects + DNS cutover, analytics verified, and two weeks of free async support after launch.
“Mariia led our project from branding and landing page design to the full UX/UI of the research platform. She did not just design screens. She built a clear and scalable system with well-thought user flows and interaction logic.”
“From start to finish, the experience was seamless, professional, and highly insightful. The insights provided by Mariia helped us streamline our user interface, reduce friction points, and create a more intuitive and enjoyable user experience.”
A plugin exports layers, not a website — you get absolute-positioned output with no CMS, no responsive logic, and markup that fights every future edit; fine for a prototype, not for production. A freelancer can be great, but the result depends on one person’s judgment, and the states your Figma never specified get guessed. An agency is accountable for the whole translation: missing states designed before the build, CMS structured for editors, performance measured against a budget, and a fixed price that does not move unless the scope does.
Fixed price per template, quoted from the Figma file before the build starts. A typical five-template marketing site lands in the lower half of the $5k–$25k Web Design range published on our pricing page — and the number does not move unless the scope does. No hourly billing, no surprise invoice.
Two and a half working weeks for a five-template site (home, product, pricing, blog, case study) with a small CMS. Bigger sites — 10+ templates, multi-language, e-commerce — run four to six weeks. We do not do "in 48 hours" conversions; that is a typing job, not a translation.
Yes — that is roughly half of our intake. We design the missing responsive states and the missing interaction states (hover, focus, loading, empty, error) with you in the first two days, before the build starts. The cost adds about three days to the timeline, never more.
At the sign-off breakpoint and the breakpoints designed in Figma — yes, verified side-by-side. At the breakpoints between (e.g. 900 px when Figma only specified 768 and 1280) we follow the design intent and check the result with you in the polish phase. We do not chase pixels at breakpoints the design never specified; we make sensible decisions and confirm them.
Yes. Migration is part of about half of our conversion engagements. We map the old URL structure to the new, build the redirects file, preserve SEO equity (titles, meta descriptions, canonical signals), and verify with Google Search Console after launch. Content migration is in scope; we do not retype 200 blog posts manually.
Yes — that is the point of the component library and the editor handoff. New blog posts and case studies are CMS-driven, three to four fields. New landing pages are composed from the existing components in 30-60 minutes. We run a 60-minute live training so your editor team is comfortable on day one.
Adjacent reading, work, and routes to explore next.
Thirty minutes, no slides. We will look at your current identity together, name the gaps, and tell you whether a five-week engagement is the right call.
Start your projectWe use cookies to see how the site is used and improve it. Analytics only run if you say yes. See our Privacy Policy.
